<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: High-Carb, Low-Fat Fruit And Veggie Diet Fruitless Against Breast Cancer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://livinlavidalowcarb.com/blog/high-carb-low-fat-fruit-and-veggie-diet-fruitless-against-breast-cancer/1933%20/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://livinlavidalowcarb.com/blog/high-carb-low-fat-fruit-and-veggie-diet-fruitless-against-breast-cancer/1933</link>
	<description>To educate, encourage, and inspire the world to start low-carb living</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://livinlavidalowcarb.com/blog/high-carb-low-fat-fruit-and-veggie-diet-fruitless-against-breast-cancer/1933#comment-6246</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 07:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livinlavidalowcarb.wordpress.com/2007/07/18/high-carb-low-fat-fruit-and-veggie-diet-fruitless-against-breast-cancer/#comment-6246</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Some changes in my thinking&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;i&gt;Since my thinking has changed drastically concerning the proper use of eggs - from my post above - it is necessary to update it.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;1. Only 1 egg should should ever be eaten at one time - with at least a six to twelve hour interval before eating another one.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;2.Weekly egg consumption should be 6-7 eggs.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;3. They should be cycled like this -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Monday (2)- 1 morning egg - 1 evening egg&lt;br/&gt;Tuesday (1) one morning egg &lt;br/&gt;Wednesday (0) none&lt;br/&gt;Thursday (0) none&lt;br/&gt;Friday (2) 1 morning egg - 1 evening egg&lt;br/&gt;Saturday (1) one morning egg &lt;br/&gt;Sunday (0) none&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The eggs are cycled - from two a day spaced 12 hours apart - to none on other days.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The bible associates eggs with Scorpions for a reason - it is expressing a reality.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Scorpions do not like one another -they fight if put together - they shed there skins six or sevens times during their life-times.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;A similar effect occurs with eggs -one by itself is fine - two together create a conflict between the two.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The conflict expressed outwardly results in the person so afflicted as being too aggorant and insensitive to surroundings - this results in conflict with others.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;There is also a conflict going on within the body - needless to say -and as - many processed foods contain a mixture of multiple egg sources - mixed with sugar and fat - cakes - cookies and many others.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Eggs and the Cholesterol they contain are catabolic in nature - meaning they tear down muscle - only three or so is needed to produce this effect - the muscle responds from this tearing down process by making itself bigger and stronger - with protein. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Excess eggs do not help this process - three in a 24 hour period is enough.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The muscles should not be subjected to a daily tear down - 2 times a week is fine - the days when no eggs are eaten gives the muscles a chance to repair completely and hopefully new muscle nerve pathways are are also being built from what should be raw whole carbs and their enzymes.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;On the the two egg days or three in a 24 period - the bodies liver and cells get a rest - they don&#039;t have too make cholesterol - on the zero egg days the body then clears any excess and damaged cholesterol - maximum cholesterol turnover is thus established and the body adapts thus by improving on these abilities over time.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This results in the body being able to remove old and oxidized cholesterol as well as build bigger lipo-protein fractions - replacing  small and denser LDL-HDL particles with larger ones.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;These are important functions.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The improper use of eggs - either not enough weekly or too many or too many at once(more than one) -  interfere with said processes.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Eggs are not the simple things people genrally see them as.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This is my current thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Some changes in my thinking</b></p>
<p><i>Since my thinking has changed drastically concerning the proper use of eggs &#8211; from my post above &#8211; it is necessary to update it.</i></p>
<p>1. Only 1 egg should should ever be eaten at one time &#8211; with at least a six to twelve hour interval before eating another one.</p>
<p>2.Weekly egg consumption should be 6-7 eggs.</p>
<p>3. They should be cycled like this -</p>
<p>Monday (2)- 1 morning egg &#8211; 1 evening egg<br />Tuesday (1) one morning egg <br />Wednesday (0) none<br />Thursday (0) none<br />Friday (2) 1 morning egg &#8211; 1 evening egg<br />Saturday (1) one morning egg <br />Sunday (0) none</p>
<p>The eggs are cycled &#8211; from two a day spaced 12 hours apart &#8211; to none on other days.</p>
<p>The bible associates eggs with Scorpions for a reason &#8211; it is expressing a reality.</p>
<p>Scorpions do not like one another -they fight if put together &#8211; they shed there skins six or sevens times during their life-times.</p>
<p>A similar effect occurs with eggs -one by itself is fine &#8211; two together create a conflict between the two.</p>
<p>The conflict expressed outwardly results in the person so afflicted as being too aggorant and insensitive to surroundings &#8211; this results in conflict with others.</p>
<p>There is also a conflict going on within the body &#8211; needless to say -and as &#8211; many processed foods contain a mixture of multiple egg sources &#8211; mixed with sugar and fat &#8211; cakes &#8211; cookies and many others.</p>
<p>Eggs and the Cholesterol they contain are catabolic in nature &#8211; meaning they tear down muscle &#8211; only three or so is needed to produce this effect &#8211; the muscle responds from this tearing down process by making itself bigger and stronger &#8211; with protein. </p>
<p>Excess eggs do not help this process &#8211; three in a 24 hour period is enough.</p>
<p>The muscles should not be subjected to a daily tear down &#8211; 2 times a week is fine &#8211; the days when no eggs are eaten gives the muscles a chance to repair completely and hopefully new muscle nerve pathways are are also being built from what should be raw whole carbs and their enzymes.</p>
<p>On the the two egg days or three in a 24 period &#8211; the bodies liver and cells get a rest &#8211; they don&#8217;t have too make cholesterol &#8211; on the zero egg days the body then clears any excess and damaged cholesterol &#8211; maximum cholesterol turnover is thus established and the body adapts thus by improving on these abilities over time.</p>
<p>This results in the body being able to remove old and oxidized cholesterol as well as build bigger lipo-protein fractions &#8211; replacing  small and denser LDL-HDL particles with larger ones.</p>
<p>These are important functions.</p>
<p>The improper use of eggs &#8211; either not enough weekly or too many or too many at once(more than one) &#8211;  interfere with said processes.</p>
<p>Eggs are not the simple things people genrally see them as.</p>
<p>This is my current thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://livinlavidalowcarb.com/blog/high-carb-low-fat-fruit-and-veggie-diet-fruitless-against-breast-cancer/1933#comment-6245</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 23:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livinlavidalowcarb.wordpress.com/2007/07/18/high-carb-low-fat-fruit-and-veggie-diet-fruitless-against-breast-cancer/#comment-6245</guid>
		<description>Another nebulous study -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;with some wrong conclusions ? -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;My point of view -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Plants do not cause any disease - if a low fat diet is linked to some cancers - it&#039;s because of fat - not the inclusion or exclusion of plants in the diet -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It&#039;s a mistake to blame one set of nutrients(vegetables for example) for something when the cause is something else -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The idea that eating massive amounts of low calorie plants and including a reasonable amount of high calorie plants in the diet is any thing but helpful to a person - is almost criminal to imply  -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The studies conclusions although not saying this directly - tended toward this line of thinking -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The lack of certain fats(natural unprocessed whole raw  fat foods) in the diet - can very likely be linked to many disorders - some cancers included -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;but this does not imply any fault with low calorie raw and cooked plants -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Nor should it lead to the idea that extracted oils are a good idea as opposed to eating high in fat - foods - whole -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;My  idea&#039;s on cancer and other nutritional diseases&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;1. two to six raw eggs a day should be included in anyones diet - whether low fat or low carb - and some raw whole coconut and raw whole olives included &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;and combined with -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;2. massive amounts of low calorie vegetables(lettuce - raw squash -cucumber - raw or fermented cabbage and some fruits and nuts and all the other plants) -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;combined with -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;3. at least one tablespoon a day of each of these eating raw and dry - beans/lentils/wheat/barley/millet/brown rice -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;the raw is mandatory - they also can be eaten cooked if wanted - but the raw part is mandatory -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;and&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;4. Fish such as water based tuna for protein and controlled amounts of high fat dairy(limited) and controlled and reasonable amounts of non fat dairy(yogurt - cottage cheese - whey)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;5. small amounts of honey or natural maple syrup and no refined sugars at all(white sugar and fructose mostly)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Conclusions -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Fat: on a 1500 a day calorie diet - even two to six raw eggs and the other whole fats suggested would result in 500 calories of fat maximum - &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;or a 30 percent fat diet&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;and two raw eggs a day and the other whole fats suggested would result in something like 160 fat calories as a minimum -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;or about a 10 to 15 percent fat diet&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This can satisfy the low fat proponents as well as those wanting more fat -&lt;br/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;People - scientist&#039;s or nutritionist&#039;s who ascribe to eating or recommending extracted oils or products of any source - animal or plant sourced -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;are on a blind path - with plenty of victim&#039;s in tow -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;extracted vegetable oils are in much the same vein as extracted refined sugars - they both lack all the other things needed that came along with the whole plant -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Excess fats from dairy and excess dairy in general can and will clog arteries - &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;There will come a time on this earth - I suspect - when most people will simply refuse to eat any refined un-natural sugars -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Not soon - but someday&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I find it amusing reading the various theories on what makes people get fat -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;and could it be any more apparent ?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Humans need absolutely zero calories from refined sugars or refined extracted fats&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And yet some and many consume 1000 calories a day of this crap - and in total foods - eating near 3000 calories or more on a day to day basis -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;and on other days binging on ice cream and cake and cookies and whole jars of peanut butter and pies - and sugared drinks&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;and eating in excess of 5000 calories a day - when they do this&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Then  people write articles asking and explaining why and how people get fat ?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And where a 1500 calorie a day diet on the right foods is more than enough to satisfy most days -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;and on binge days eating the right foods still only adds at most another 1000 calories or 2500 total calories - and this is what nutritional sanity is&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;There&#039;s no mystery here - it&#039;s very very simple - why and how people get fat -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I don&#039;t need to run a research study costing 20 million dollars and taking 10 years recording what 20,000 people might eat ? - &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;because people don&#039;t actually eat what they say they eat anyway - for a large part - and this  makes these types of studies suspect to begin with -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It only took a few hours of simple observation and  thought - to surmise this&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;No one - not one single person or close - ever got fat eating whole plant products and very few eating whole unprocessed animal products either -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;While explaining this sort of nutritional insanity - I might as well explain another one -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;There&#039;s a subset of people with various backgrounds - from laymen to doctor&#039;s -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;who believe that grains - in particular - can be linked to every disease known to man -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This line of thinking goes beyond simple nutritional insanity and takes a quantum leap forward into something like super-nutritional insanity -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Eating Raw Grains/Beans/Millet/Wheat/Rice/Lentils/Barley of a least a tablespoon a day will someday be considered a nutritional requirement -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;There are a few people who apparently have a genetic problem with grains - but even these people in my opinion should eat some of them - and some raw - even if the amounts may need to be reduced for them -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But to suggest that whole grains or beans - raw or cooked - are harmful is simply wrong &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;There&#039;s not one single food on this planet that I personally - am allergic too - it&#039;s all mostly nonsense - allergies - and when they do exist are mainly the result of eating meat/chicken/shrimp/man-made raised yeasts and products - &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I personally do not eat meat/chicken/man made yeasts/unclean fish/shrimp -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But these are the only foods I do not eat -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I do eat - mostly raw - eggs and /dairy/fish/honey products&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;For those who do eat meat and the rest - it&#039;s a long term thing - over the very long run these are harmful - some of them such as yeast products can kill very short term - as some alcoholic&#039;s will attest&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I don&#039;t tell people what to eat though - they can eat there under-ware if they want - fine with me &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But I do like to know why and what does what - and explain it - simply - and understandably&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Nutritional Myths -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The main one&#039;s&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;1. Eggs - 2 to 6 a day raw - un-oxidized cholesterol and all is my rule -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;and you already know what the myth&#039;s are here -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;2. One tablespoon minimum daily of each - eaten raw and dry -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;of lentils/beans/millet/barley/wheat/brown rice&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;the mixture of lectins and other from these raw seeds will some day be regarded as a very important nutritional requirement and a powerful one&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;as opposed to the myth they are harmful &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;As to the study - breast cancer is probably better linked to the garbage people  eat - and the lack good foods they don&#039;t eat - rather than to the  specific amounts  of good food that they do eat -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Put the blame where it belongs -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;On processed sugars and extracted and manipulated fats and - the lack of good foods people need -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Of course this might rile the lunatics producing the vast quantities of white sugar/fructose and the huge amounts of extracted vegetable/nut oils a bit  -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;as well as the cereal industry -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But although these people who produce these un-natural products can and should be labeled as criminals -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;No one is forcing there victim&#039;s to indulge in them either -&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;One of the man made food products I actually approve of is - is Nutrasweet and it&#039;s friends - &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;an enemy of white refined sugar and fructose - if you will&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Nutrasweet and honey bee&#039;s and unsweetened dark chocolate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another nebulous study -</p>
<p>with some wrong conclusions ? -</p>
<p>My point of view -</p>
<p>Plants do not cause any disease &#8211; if a low fat diet is linked to some cancers &#8211; it&#8217;s because of fat &#8211; not the inclusion or exclusion of plants in the diet -</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a mistake to blame one set of nutrients(vegetables for example) for something when the cause is something else -</p>
<p>The idea that eating massive amounts of low calorie plants and including a reasonable amount of high calorie plants in the diet is any thing but helpful to a person &#8211; is almost criminal to imply  -</p>
<p>The studies conclusions although not saying this directly &#8211; tended toward this line of thinking -</p>
<p>The lack of certain fats(natural unprocessed whole raw  fat foods) in the diet &#8211; can very likely be linked to many disorders &#8211; some cancers included -</p>
<p>but this does not imply any fault with low calorie raw and cooked plants -</p>
<p>Nor should it lead to the idea that extracted oils are a good idea as opposed to eating high in fat &#8211; foods &#8211; whole -</p>
<p>My  idea&#8217;s on cancer and other nutritional diseases</p>
<p>1. two to six raw eggs a day should be included in anyones diet &#8211; whether low fat or low carb &#8211; and some raw whole coconut and raw whole olives included </p>
<p>and combined with -</p>
<p>2. massive amounts of low calorie vegetables(lettuce &#8211; raw squash -cucumber &#8211; raw or fermented cabbage and some fruits and nuts and all the other plants) -</p>
<p>combined with -</p>
<p>3. at least one tablespoon a day of each of these eating raw and dry &#8211; beans/lentils/wheat/barley/millet/brown rice -</p>
<p>the raw is mandatory &#8211; they also can be eaten cooked if wanted &#8211; but the raw part is mandatory -</p>
<p>and</p>
<p>4. Fish such as water based tuna for protein and controlled amounts of high fat dairy(limited) and controlled and reasonable amounts of non fat dairy(yogurt &#8211; cottage cheese &#8211; whey)</p>
<p>5. small amounts of honey or natural maple syrup and no refined sugars at all(white sugar and fructose mostly)</p>
<p>Conclusions -</p>
<p>Fat: on a 1500 a day calorie diet &#8211; even two to six raw eggs and the other whole fats suggested would result in 500 calories of fat maximum &#8211; </p>
<p>or a 30 percent fat diet</p>
<p>and two raw eggs a day and the other whole fats suggested would result in something like 160 fat calories as a minimum -</p>
<p>or about a 10 to 15 percent fat diet</p>
<p>This can satisfy the low fat proponents as well as those wanting more fat -</p>
<p>People &#8211; scientist&#8217;s or nutritionist&#8217;s who ascribe to eating or recommending extracted oils or products of any source &#8211; animal or plant sourced -</p>
<p>are on a blind path &#8211; with plenty of victim&#8217;s in tow -</p>
<p>extracted vegetable oils are in much the same vein as extracted refined sugars &#8211; they both lack all the other things needed that came along with the whole plant -</p>
<p>Excess fats from dairy and excess dairy in general can and will clog arteries &#8211; </p>
<p>There will come a time on this earth &#8211; I suspect &#8211; when most people will simply refuse to eat any refined un-natural sugars -</p>
<p>Not soon &#8211; but someday</p>
<p>I find it amusing reading the various theories on what makes people get fat -</p>
<p>and could it be any more apparent ?</p>
<p>Humans need absolutely zero calories from refined sugars or refined extracted fats</p>
<p>And yet some and many consume 1000 calories a day of this crap &#8211; and in total foods &#8211; eating near 3000 calories or more on a day to day basis -</p>
<p>and on other days binging on ice cream and cake and cookies and whole jars of peanut butter and pies &#8211; and sugared drinks</p>
<p>and eating in excess of 5000 calories a day &#8211; when they do this</p>
<p>Then  people write articles asking and explaining why and how people get fat ?</p>
<p>And where a 1500 calorie a day diet on the right foods is more than enough to satisfy most days -</p>
<p>and on binge days eating the right foods still only adds at most another 1000 calories or 2500 total calories &#8211; and this is what nutritional sanity is</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no mystery here &#8211; it&#8217;s very very simple &#8211; why and how people get fat -</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t need to run a research study costing 20 million dollars and taking 10 years recording what 20,000 people might eat ? &#8211; </p>
<p>because people don&#8217;t actually eat what they say they eat anyway &#8211; for a large part &#8211; and this  makes these types of studies suspect to begin with -</p>
<p>It only took a few hours of simple observation and  thought &#8211; to surmise this</p>
<p>No one &#8211; not one single person or close &#8211; ever got fat eating whole plant products and very few eating whole unprocessed animal products either -</p>
<p>While explaining this sort of nutritional insanity &#8211; I might as well explain another one -</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a subset of people with various backgrounds &#8211; from laymen to doctor&#8217;s -</p>
<p>who believe that grains &#8211; in particular &#8211; can be linked to every disease known to man -</p>
<p>This line of thinking goes beyond simple nutritional insanity and takes a quantum leap forward into something like super-nutritional insanity -</p>
<p>Eating Raw Grains/Beans/Millet/Wheat/Rice/Lentils/Barley of a least a tablespoon a day will someday be considered a nutritional requirement -</p>
<p>There are a few people who apparently have a genetic problem with grains &#8211; but even these people in my opinion should eat some of them &#8211; and some raw &#8211; even if the amounts may need to be reduced for them -</p>
<p>But to suggest that whole grains or beans &#8211; raw or cooked &#8211; are harmful is simply wrong </p>
<p>There&#8217;s not one single food on this planet that I personally &#8211; am allergic too &#8211; it&#8217;s all mostly nonsense &#8211; allergies &#8211; and when they do exist are mainly the result of eating meat/chicken/shrimp/man-made raised yeasts and products &#8211; </p>
<p>I personally do not eat meat/chicken/man made yeasts/unclean fish/shrimp -</p>
<p>But these are the only foods I do not eat -</p>
<p>I do eat &#8211; mostly raw &#8211; eggs and /dairy/fish/honey products</p>
<p>For those who do eat meat and the rest &#8211; it&#8217;s a long term thing &#8211; over the very long run these are harmful &#8211; some of them such as yeast products can kill very short term &#8211; as some alcoholic&#8217;s will attest</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t tell people what to eat though &#8211; they can eat there under-ware if they want &#8211; fine with me </p>
<p>But I do like to know why and what does what &#8211; and explain it &#8211; simply &#8211; and understandably</p>
<p>Nutritional Myths -</p>
<p>The main one&#8217;s</p>
<p>1. Eggs &#8211; 2 to 6 a day raw &#8211; un-oxidized cholesterol and all is my rule -</p>
<p>and you already know what the myth&#8217;s are here -</p>
<p>2. One tablespoon minimum daily of each &#8211; eaten raw and dry -</p>
<p>of lentils/beans/millet/barley/wheat/brown rice</p>
<p>the mixture of lectins and other from these raw seeds will some day be regarded as a very important nutritional requirement and a powerful one</p>
<p>as opposed to the myth they are harmful </p>
<p>As to the study &#8211; breast cancer is probably better linked to the garbage people  eat &#8211; and the lack good foods they don&#8217;t eat &#8211; rather than to the  specific amounts  of good food that they do eat -</p>
<p>Put the blame where it belongs -</p>
<p>On processed sugars and extracted and manipulated fats and &#8211; the lack of good foods people need -</p>
<p>Of course this might rile the lunatics producing the vast quantities of white sugar/fructose and the huge amounts of extracted vegetable/nut oils a bit  -</p>
<p>as well as the cereal industry -</p>
<p>But although these people who produce these un-natural products can and should be labeled as criminals -</p>
<p>No one is forcing there victim&#8217;s to indulge in them either -</p>
<p>One of the man made food products I actually approve of is &#8211; is Nutrasweet and it&#8217;s friends &#8211; </p>
<p>an enemy of white refined sugar and fructose &#8211; if you will</p>
<p>Nutrasweet and honey bee&#8217;s and unsweetened dark chocolate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

