E-mail Updates!

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner



Remembering Kevin Moore

My Latest Tweets

LLVLC Archives


Detox
– Detoxify the body naturally with the healing powers of herbs and fiber. Cleanse the body of harmful toxins and waste by choosing an all-natural herbal fiber supplement. Cleanse and detox to start feeling your best! Jumpstart your health!






Contour Abs

Do Sarah Palin’s E-mails Reveal She’s A Closet Low-Carber?

One of the most polarizing figures in modern-day American politics has got to be the former governor of Alaska and the 2008 Republican vice-presidential nominee Sarah Palin. Just the sound of her name evokes a wide variety of reaction from people like nobody else out there. People generally either really love her or they really hate her–there is hardly ever anyone in between these two extremes about her. Regardless of which side of the political spectrum you fall on and what you may personally think about Sarah Palin, there’s no denying she is a major figure in politics and probably looks like a contender for the GOP nomination for president in the 2012 elections. She’s got name recognition after being thrust onto the scene three years ago and many people look up to her as a leader. Even the staunchest Palin critics would agree she wields great influence over at least a certain segment of the population.

You might be wondering why the heck I’m even talking about Sarah Palin on a blog dedicated to the subject of nutrition, health and low-carbohydrate living. Well, there’s a perfectly good explanation for it that I’ll get to in a moment. But lest I’m somehow misunderstood or misconstrued, let me be extremely clear: I am by no means endorsing or asking people to support Sarah Palin in any way. As I’ve already stated, most people already have an opinion about the woman that will determine whether you would or could ever support her if she does end up running for President of the United States. And this issue I’m about to talk about is relevant if somehow we end up with a President Palin someday (okay, about half of your just fainted, but stick with me on this).

Honestly, this really has little to do with Sarah Palin as much as it does someone in her position of power. And that’s the crux of this news I have to share with you today that should be the take away message. You see, there have been some rather interesting revelations come out in the past few days from the release of nearly 25,000 e-mails while Palin was the Alaskan governor. Most of the information contained therein was about her gubernatorial duties, party politics, and whatnot. But hidden among all those folksy responses was an interesting exchange she had with her residence manager named Erika Fagerstron on July 29, 2008 about her dietary habits revealed in this ABC News story:

Fagerstron told the governor she was heading to the store to buy “a couple of things for the house.”

“Do you need anything?” Fagerstron asked, noting “I have formula and mocha stuff on my list.”

Palin’s response “Small bottles of champagne, low carb foods. Thanks!”

Erika replied, “Sorry, but Im not sure what kind of low carb stuff to buy.”

“It’s cool,” Palin wrote back. “I’ll get to the store at some point here for that. Mainly, just dont want the kids to have too much sugar/white carb stuff.”

WHOA! Did you see that? At the time that was written, Palin was a sitting governor and close to being selected as John McCain’s running mate on the GOP ticket. While it doesn’t appear she necessarily used her position of power to influence public policy regarding nutrition while in office, she obviously believes in the value of low-carb diets especially with her children. It makes you wonder how many other governors, U.S. Senators, U.S. Congressmen, and even presidents are closet low-carbers. And if they, like Palin, believe this way of eating is healthy for their families, then why wouldn’t they want to promote it to their constituents as well?

All it takes is one look at the recently-released “Food Plate” from the USDA to see why the promotion of a healthy low-carb lifestyle to the masses is so sorely needed:


http://youtu.be/SEFmSk08LIE

In the recent survey of my readers in April 2011, one of the questions I asked was what it would take to make high-fat, low-carb nutrition more mainstream. One answer that received a lot of votes was “a famous person starts promoting it.” In fact, some people responded more specifically with “when the President of the United States starts promoting it.” And that’s why Palin, President Barack Obama, former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, former Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty and all the other contenders for POTUS are a possible missing element in seeing major changes happen at the USDA before they come up with the 2015 Dietary Guidelines.

Whoever is President of the United States after the 2012 election will be choosing who will serve on the 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee. The current leaders at the USDA say “the evidence is just not there” about low-carb diets despite overwhelming genuine science that IS there which Consumer Reports reported on in their June 2011 issue. The fact is the low-carb research was ignored in the 2010 Dietary Guidelines and it’s not surprising–not one single low-carb researcher was asked to serve on the Committee. But what if we had a President who believed strongly in the message of livin’ la vida low-carb like Sarah Palin expressed in these e-mails? Would it make a difference?

Again, please don’t make the mistake of thinking I’m promoting Sarah Palin for President of the United States. I am not. But she serves as a good example of the kind of thinking we’d like for our political leaders in positions of power to have to get past the stigma about low-carb diets being a dangerous fad that still exists despite the fact that respected Harvard School of Public Health leaders are now publicly bemoaning low-fat diets. The tide is indeed turning in favor of healthy saturated fats and a significant reduction in carbohydrate intake from the Standard American Diet. Will a pro low-carb president who isn’t afraid to take on the special interests in the food and pharmaceutical industries help to push low-carb living into the mainstream? In the style of Palin, all I can say is “you betcha!”

  • Ginette

    I had a chance to read the Harvard article on the bottom of your Harvard link titled “Principals of Healthy Menu R & D: A Focus on Fat”. I like their discussion against fat free foods, but I don’t like their summary on page 3 of healthy fats. They have saturated in the harm column and omega 6 seed oils on the benefit side.

    • http://www.livinlavidalowcarb.com Jimmy Moore

      They’re changing. Good things coming from Dr. Walter Willett soon.

  • Cindy

    In her book, “Going Rogue” she discusses her love of meat – salmon, moose, caribou, and the like. She also wrote about the accusations that she got from the McCain team about not eating enough carbs. They accused her of eating too much fat and protein and not enough food for energy.

    If I remember correctly, she did deny being on a low-carb diet for weight loss. She said those were just her preferred foods in general.

    • http://www.livinlavidalowcarb.com Jimmy Moore

      And perhaps she was right–it could be for her health more than weight loss.

  • Cassy

    Re: “And if they, like Palin, believe this way of eating is healthy for their families, then why wouldn’t they want to promote it to their constituents as well?”

    Well, not everybody believes in legislating what people should eat. Some politicians actually believe in letting parents make decisions for themselves and their kids.

    • http://www.livinlavidalowcarb.com Jimmy Moore

      Not advocating that nutrition be legislated. But strong leadership and equal promotion of the science behind healthy high-fat, low-carb living as an option for people to feel confident in.

  • Michelle from Durham

    Jimmy,

    I am reading the book Game Change about the 2008 election. And yes, Sarah Palin was on the Atkins diet during the election and one of McCain’s aides told her that “goofy diet” was bad for her and told her to get off it that she needed to eat a “balanced diet” to perform at her highest level.

    I wonder how many other politicians eat low-carb or paleo but just do not let it be known.

    • http://www.livinlavidalowcarb.com Jimmy Moore

      I wonder too Michelle. For the sake of the future health of our nation, I hope they come out in force sometime soon. It would help solve a lot of the healthcare issues that have been so heavily debated in recent years.

  • anne h

    I wonder how many people in general – not just celebrities – but how many of us do for a fact eat now carb – and maybe don’t advertise it?

    • http://www.livinlavidalowcarb.com Jimmy Moore

      More than we know.

  • Mike

    Endorse Ron Paul and you eliminate the debate of what the federal gov’t deems a healthy diet altogether. Running presidential candidate, congressman and medical doctor Ron Paul would argue that governmental bodies mandating of what constitutes a healthy diet goes beyond what the role of the federal gov’t ought to be and would further assert that it is up to the individual to do their research and decide what they ought to be eating.

    Ron Paul 2012.

    P.S. Just recently, Dr. Paul introduced a bill into the house that would prevent the FDA from persecuting farmers involved in the interstate sale of raw milk.

    • http://www.livinlavidalowcarb.com Jimmy Moore

      Mike, I agree it’s not the government’s business.

  • Peggy Holloway

    Michelle Obama is actively (excuse the pun) involved in the anti-childhood obesity campaign. She is an intelligent person, just misguided, and I think she is sincere. What would be the possibility of a finding a way to get the low-carb message to her? Is there a method by which all of us who frequent this blog could send her reading recommendations and links? If I have time, I might do some investigating. I get emails from all the Democratic and Progressive groups. (Yes, there actually is a low-carb liberal out there :) )
    From her body type, I suspect she is also someone who could benefit from a HFLC diet. I suspect is she didn’t workout, she would quickly find herself overweight and even “diabetic.”
    If our community could figure out how to get Michelle and Oprah on the low-carb bandwagon, the turning point would be reached in weeks, if not days.

    • http://www.livinlavidalowcarb.com Jimmy Moore

      Oh, there are a lot of low-carb liberals Peggy. :)

      Gary Taubes sent Michelle Obama his book.

  • Peggy Holloway

    Hurray for Gary! I hope she reads it!

  • Torstein

    I don’t think Michelle will come around, she has invested a lot in the plate-model, but she must be given points for addressing the issue.

    Unfortunately her influence ends up in schools as obligatory no-fat meals, a few vegetables and a lot of “healthy whole wheat bread” karbs if I’m not mistaken?

    • http://www.livinlavidalowcarb.com Jimmy Moore

      I think the Food Plate will end up doing a LOT more harm than good…no matter how well-intentioned it was..

  • Scott

    Let’s face it, a diet high in meat and fat is never going to be promoted by the liberal media. It just doesn’t fit their political narrative.

    • http://www.livinlavidalowcarb.com Jimmy Moore

      Never say never. I think it could happen if the culture learns they’ve been lied to.

  • Jennifer

    I wouldn’t cheer Palin on too hard over low carb. Didn’t she make a point of bringing COOKIES to school children awhile ago because Michelle Obama was discouraging consumption of sweets at school?

  • Christina

    Yes, Jennifer, Palin did protest school guidelines: http://abcnews.go.com/US/cookie-protest-sarah-palin-calls-pennsylvania-nanny-state/story?id=12104862. Although she may not provide sweets to her own children (of which I applaud), I am appalled that she is against state-run school programs condemning sweets in school.

    The following is quoted from the article:

    An effort by Pennsylvania schools to get students to eat healthier is coming under fire from Sarah Palin.

    The proposed new guidelines would limit the amount of sweets in classroom parties and reduce the number of holiday and birthday celebrations.

    On the proposed regulations, Palin called Pennsylvania a “nanny state run amok.” In protest, she brought 200 sugar cookies to a Bucks County school fundraiser Tuesday.

    “I had to shake it up a little bit because I heard there is a debate going on in Pennsylvania over whether most schools condemn sweets, cakes, cookies, that type of thing,” Palin said. “I brought dozens and dozens of cookies to these students.”

  • Torstein

    I think Palin’s thinking here is correct and goes into policy or the fundamental way of looking at food.

    Meat-eaters don’t want to discourage Vegans or Vegetarians, and will not protest letting people eat like that. So the same should exist the other way. Children and people that can consume sweets without getting fat or sick should have the same rights to eat what they want in school, be it a HFCS Pepsi or not.

    The solution is like Palin suggests in her “protest” to let the parents control what a child eats at school or not.

    To illustrate we can pretend Micheele Obama was a dedicated low-carber. Would anyone suggest that we ban the Vegetarian diet in school for children, by insisting that they eat atleast one mandatory ox-bone with marrow a day at school-lunch?

  • Christina

    Torstein, I get your point. My point is that for those of us who have been trying to get sugar and processed foods out of the school lunch program, Palin’s actions slap us upside the head. In protesting the “nanny state” school lunch program by bringing “dozens and dozens of cookies to these students,” she is not supportive of parents’ concerns that school lunch programs have too many processed foods and sugars.

  • Morty Silverglate

    Sarah Palin is definitely the sexiest presidential candidate. If low-carb keeps her in bikini shape, we’ll finally see a fit and fabulous president in 2012. I know I’ll be throwing out my bagels (carbs, and just found out their jewish!?) and voting low-carb from now on.

  • Torstein

    Christina, I would agree with you on that state/school-food programs full of sugar _should_ be addressed if they have them. Most people are sheep when it comes to food, but perhaps a double-whammy would do something, that is Scientists waking up and pointing to sugars and refined carbs, but promoting fats (healthy) and that again affecting the general parent-population? Its a BIG, complex issue.. (exuse my pun :)

  • JCM

    I have a dream . . . that Oprah will have Gary Taubes on her show (and bar the door against Dr. Oz crashing the party), do a 180 on meat and a 180 on carbs. That could significantly change the paradigm for millions of viewers. And she’d probably not struggle any longer with her weight (although that would deprive her producers of show topics).

    • http://www.livinlavidalowcarb.com Jimmy Moore

      Of course, it won’t happen now that she’s quit her show.