<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Consensus On Cholesterol Is Avoid Statins</title>
	<atom:link href="http://livinlavidalowcarb.com/blog/consensus-on-cholesterol-is-avoid-statins/763%20/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://livinlavidalowcarb.com/blog/consensus-on-cholesterol-is-avoid-statins/763</link>
	<description>To educate, encourage, and inspire the world to start low-carb living</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://livinlavidalowcarb.com/blog/consensus-on-cholesterol-is-avoid-statins/763#comment-1562</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livinlavidalowcarb.wordpress.com/2006/04/01/consensus-on-cholesterol-is-avoid-statins/#comment-1562</guid>
		<description>I got off of a statin prescription. It can be done! I would rather try to do it the natural way than to rely on a synthetic substance.  Great blog!&lt;br/&gt;Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got off of a statin prescription. It can be done! I would rather try to do it the natural way than to rely on a synthetic substance.  Great blog!<br />Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leigh</title>
		<link>http://livinlavidalowcarb.com/blog/consensus-on-cholesterol-is-avoid-statins/763#comment-1561</link>
		<dc:creator>Leigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 20:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livinlavidalowcarb.wordpress.com/2006/04/01/consensus-on-cholesterol-is-avoid-statins/#comment-1561</guid>
		<description>My cholesterol has always been in the 230-260 range, with very high HDL.  I have refused statins for 15 years and will continue to refuse them.  I also refused HRT, turned out to be right about that, eschewed the low-fat diet to ward off heart disease, turned out to be right about that, too.  If you look into the history of acceptable cholesterol numbers, you find that &quot;they&quot; keep lowering them.  I wonder how many healthy humans would actually have the acceptable numbers without drugs.  I think you are correct to add the natural measures and retest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My cholesterol has always been in the 230-260 range, with very high HDL.  I have refused statins for 15 years and will continue to refuse them.  I also refused HRT, turned out to be right about that, eschewed the low-fat diet to ward off heart disease, turned out to be right about that, too.  If you look into the history of acceptable cholesterol numbers, you find that &#8220;they&#8221; keep lowering them.  I wonder how many healthy humans would actually have the acceptable numbers without drugs.  I think you are correct to add the natural measures and retest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Newbirth</title>
		<link>http://livinlavidalowcarb.com/blog/consensus-on-cholesterol-is-avoid-statins/763#comment-1560</link>
		<dc:creator>Newbirth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 02:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livinlavidalowcarb.wordpress.com/2006/04/01/consensus-on-cholesterol-is-avoid-statins/#comment-1560</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&quot;An LDL of 170 does seem pretty high. I was told it should be under 100.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;That&#039;s what we&#039;ve all been &quot;told,&quot; but is it absolutely necessary that LDL be less than 100? That was my question.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;If it was 120 that might be one thing, but 170 is more than a little high.  I think it&#039;s absolutely necessary that you get it down some.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I get retested this summer...you&#039;re scaring me now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;An LDL of 170 does seem pretty high. I was told it should be under 100.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><b>That&#8217;s what we&#8217;ve all been &#8220;told,&#8221; but is it absolutely necessary that LDL be less than 100? That was my question.</b></p>
<p>If it was 120 that might be one thing, but 170 is more than a little high.  I think it&#8217;s absolutely necessary that you get it down some.</p>
<p>I get retested this summer&#8230;you&#8217;re scaring me now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

